Saturday, September 29, 2007

With Grain & Against Grain


With Gain

In "On Teenagers and Tattoos", Martin gives psychogenic insights and arguments toward teenagers' tattooing behaviors with "an interested and nonjudgmental appreciation". He insists three keystone views on how permanent natural of tattoos are related to teenagers mental needs. First, he believes that tattoos provide control of their identity crises and help distinguish themselves from the unrecognizable body and strange environment. Secondly, Martin thinks tattoos represent significant notions or experiences to their owners. And finally, he regards teens tattooing as a mentally comfort of stability and constancy within a shaky society. Dr. Martin's ideas broke the unpleasant traditional judgments about tattoos and encourage fellow psychiatrists to examine the relationships between tattoos and teenagers' inner self in a positive way. Besides the pursuing demand of external embellishment and seeking of individuality from parents, Martin treats tattooing as an influential symptom that will better help to understand the hardly visible teen psyche. Everyone will do things with a purpose, especially things that cost pains, and teenagers are no exception. We could just call it a self-torment, if we don't understand the importance behide teens tattooing, and by carefully observing this conduct, Martin found his theory of this connection, and gives sensible supports to his articles.



Against Gain

Dr. Andres Martin's "On Teenagers and Tattoos" envisions a psychological method to understand teenagers through the practice of tattooing in a limited perspective. He based his examinations on narrow individuals who are more likely to have an intense personalities or teens that had have significant past experiments in their life. He ignored the fact that the majority teenagers who have tattoos often get them for casual reasons, which link to popular trend and peer pressure. Thus, Martin’s concept will be more suitable on mature adults or some specific teenagers that fit into certain categories. Teens these days are fairly adaptable to the inconstant society. They are not reluctant to try new manners, instead, they invent fresh ideas and eager for revolutions and that raises doubt about Marin's sense of permanent belonging within teenagers tattooing. Consequently, his standpoints on the relationship between teenagers and tattoos are focusing in specified issues that lack wholeness. To be able to understand fully about the context, numerous fields that cause different impacts should be consider before we making any conclusions.

Saturday, September 22, 2007

So Done...

Numerous of anti-smoking campaigns have launched recently to attack the dreadful culture of smoking. The battle between the offense and defense is severe. To figure out what makes smoking so attractive to smokers who chose a cigarette rather than their health, and how do people efficiently promote anti-smoking ideas can bond to a deeper understanding of their advertisement tactics. The culture of smoking is an ancient story, but unlike the settlers, who learned to smoke and brought the practice back to Europe as a drug recreation, the native people consumed them as entheogen- a psychoactive substance that induce alterations of consciousness. Since the introduction of tobacco, the whole world has built a smoking culture around it. There are those who believe that done in moderation, smoking can enhance their allure, especially teenagers who want to look voguish, and hoping the practice would help them build self-confident. As oppositions arise, manufacturers are increasingly exploiting markets through the use of media to entice consumers. Tobacco, under human abuse, has ironically changed from the old-days helping tool into a modern killing machine. But how can others challenge this powerful culture contained various groups of individuals? You will possibly find the answer by watching their advertisements. While I was in search of advertisements on different online web pages, I found two innovative and impressive ads both have outstanding ideas to persuade viewers not to smoke, though, targeting different audiences with different anti-smoking impacts.


One of the two ads is chose from Foote Cone & Belding in Singapore who published a series of fashion spoofing anti-smoking works by famous photographer-Eryk Fikau. This advertising photograph shows a curled red haired women lying against a cigarette-ash-like leaf-cover whom wear a red sleeve-less long night dress. She is as pale as the ashen leafs with a bunch of precious pearls tied around her neck. A tiny beauty spot reveals under her slightly unlocked lips. Her fine-looking cold face turned to her right arm loosely with the two widely opened spiritless eyes looking at nowhere. The mood is chill but artistically fascinates the viewers with its powerful color contrast and elegant tone. The main body of this model was positioned diagonally from the upper left to the bottom right with her left arm lying flat on top of her belly in 90 degrees, and her right arm stretching out in a triangle shape on the dry leafs, with her palm facing her face. The pose seems pretty natural, however, this pair of anemic hands was intentionally arrange with the bloody red dress in opposite directions, thus, forming a cross effect. In art, it is a successful strategy to create movement and built balance within the composition. Apparently, this upper-class woman is rich, appealing and trendy in her early to late twenties, who died from lung cancer. Under her head stated: "LUNG CANCER DOESN'T GO WITH CHRISTIAN DIOR", a large and bold slogan typed in black filling more than half the bottom left corner of the photo. The designers avoided the direct use of negative words like "smoke", "bad", "kill" ect., instead, they pulled out one of the most serious smoking-cause illness-"lung cancer"-in the first place, versus one of the most famous fashion brand-"Christian Dior", providing fact along with unexpected idea that surprise their target audiences (women who appeal to fashion). However, the entire photograph is very symbolic, no smoke or a signal cigarette can be found from the entire image. From the visual point of view, this photo is definitely something you will see in a fashion magazine that marks a stunning impression. Despite its written massage, the photographer shot the photo at a straight forward art basic, and the letters are the most crucial element that ignites the meaningful inspiration. Although, smoking has long treated as a popular culture as well as a social fashion, but what this ad telling us is that we don't have to match with a cigarette to be modish. The publishers recognized the psychological tactic that most cigarette manufacturers are using to draw female smokers; moreover, they cleverly used this selling point to turn the gun back against smoking itself. And the result is overwhelming.


Another interesting anti-smoking photograph I’m going to discuss is surprisingly plain and simple. There’re no nice-looking human model, no touching story telling, nor any special effects that caught you like the former one above. Only two objects and two words are included within the picture, plus a ponderous hard-stone background behide them, giving audiences a feel of documentary shot. The two bolded and white color words “Quick.” and “Slow.” are centered parallelly to each other along with a slim bullet compare to a regular size cigarette both pointing to the same direction horizontally. The word “Quick.” is place right below the bullet while “Slow.” is under the cigarette. Without any decorative explanation, the publishers send the warning undoubtedly clear to the smokers: a cigarette is just like a bullet, it can kill you, but only in a different speed. As the first ad, this one is also trying to persuade people don’t smoke or stop smoking, but with a hugely different attitude than Eryk Fitau’s tasteful image. This old-fashion ad gives a pure contrast transmitting a meaningful truth, which targets more conservative and mature smokers in the common groups. It successfully stamps an indelible impression upon viewers’ mind- every time you pick up a cigarette and hold it between your lips, the bullet will pop up on the spot, and reminds you: you are killing yourself.


Don’t you think these anti-smoking ads are as powerful and influential as those smoking propagandas? In this media community of ours, advertisements have a significant role that impacts the way we think and persuades us into their ideal concepts. Anyone will be surprised by these two outstanding anti-smoking ads-each one has their different astonishing techniques toward the same approach to produce their own distinctive outcomes.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Smoking Free

Long before Europeans arrived in North & South America five centuries ago, Native Americans were using tobacco for medical needs. But unlike the settlers, who learned to smoke and brought the practice back to Europe as a drug recreation, the native people consumed them as entheogen. Since the introduction of tobacco, the whole world had built a smoking culture around it. There are those who believe that done in moderation, smoking can enhance their allure, especially teenagers who want to look voguish, and hoping the practice would help them build self-confident. Smoking considered as a masculine habit had became a history, manufacturers are increasing marketing not only youngsters, the feminization of smoking occurred with the advent of fashion that appeal to women, who might see the use of these brands as a way to increase their sexual appeal. Tobacco, under human abuse, had ironically changed from the old-days helping tool into a modern killing machine. While I was in search of advertisements on different online web pages, I found two innovative and impressive ads both have outstanding ideas to persuade viewers not to smoke, though, targeting different audiences with different anti-smoking impacts.


One of the two ads is chosen from Foote Cone & Belding in Singapore who published a series of fashion spoofing anti-smoking works by famous photographer-Eryk Fitau. This advertising photograph shows a curled puffy red hair women lying against a cigarette-ash-like leaf-cover whom wear a red sleeve-less long night dress. She is as pale as the ashen leafs with a bunch of precious pearls tied around her neck. A tiny beauty spot reveals under her slightly unlocked lips, where her fine-looking cold face turned to her right arm loosely with the two spiritless eyes widely opened looking at nowhere. The mood is chill but artistically fascinates the viewers with its powerful color contrast and elegant tone. The main body of this model was positioned diagonally from the upper left to the bottom right with her left arm lying flat on top of her belly in 90 degrees, and her right arm stretching out in a triangle shape on the dry leafs, with her palm facing her face. The pose seems pretty natural, however, this pair of anemic hands were intentionally arrange with the bloody red dress in opposite directions, thus, forming a cross effect. In art, it is a successful strategy to create movement and built balance within the composition. Apparently, this upper-class woman is rich, appealing and trendy in her early to late twenties, who died from lung cancer. Under her head stated: "LUNG CANCER DOESN'T GO WITH CHRISTIAN DIOR", a large and bold slogan typed in black filling more than half the bottom left corner of the photo. Smoking has long treated as a popular culture as well as a social fashion. What this ad telling us is that we don't have to match with a cigarette to be modish. The publishers recognized the psychological tactic that most cigarette manufacturers are using to draw female smokers; moreover, they cleverly used this selling point to turn the gun back against smoking itself. From the visual point of view, this photo is definitely something you will see in a fashion magazine that marks a stunning impression. However, the entire photograph is very symbolic, no smoke or a signal cigarette can be found from the photo. Despite its purpose, the photographer shot this photo at a straight forward art basic; the letters are the most crucial element that ignites the meaningful inspiration. The designers avoid the direct use of negative words like "smoke", "bad", "kill" ect., instead, they pull out one of the most serious smoking-cause illness-"lung cancer"-in the first place, versus one of the most famous fashion brand-"Christian Dior", providing fact along with unexpected idea that surprise their target audiences (women who appeal to fashion). And the result is overwhelming.



Another interesting anti-smoking photograph I’m going to discuss is surprisingly plain and simple. There’re no nice-looking human model, no touching story telling, nor any special effects that caught you like the former one above. Only two objects and two words are included within the picture, plus a ponderous hard-stone background behide them, giving audiences a feel of documentary shot. The two bolded and white color words “Quick.” and “Slow.” are centered parallelly to each other along with a slim bullet compare to a regular size cigarette both pointing to the same direction horizontally. The word “Quick.” is place right below the bullet while “Slow.” is under the cigarette. Without any decorative explanation, the publishers send the warning undoubtedly clear to the smokers: a cigarette is just like a bullet, it can kill you, but only in a different speed. Obviously, this ad is trying to persuade people don’t smoke or stop smoking, but with a hugely different attitude than Eryk Fitau’s tasteful image. This old-fashion ad gives a pure contrast transmitting a meaningful truth, which targets more conservative and mature smokers in the common groups. It successfully stamps an indelible impression upon viewers’ mind- every time you pick up a cigarette and hold it between your lips, the bullet will pop up on the spot, and telling you: you are killing yourself.

Thursday, September 6, 2007

Rhetorical Clothing


I agree clothes not only have their particle function to protect as garment, the massages they send among others become the root of why and how people choose their clothes in our modern society. These social massages, however, can sometimes have deliberate purpose which creates desirable or undesirable effects that people may not know.


When I was still a little girl, my parents were used to be the designers for my appearance, which I think is unfortunate. I had to worn whatever they brought, that in their opinions, is suitable on me. It was O.K. to me unless they don't force me to wear skirts and tight clothes that made me feel uneasy. So basically, I had no opinions or any judgments on my outlook, and barely look into a mirror like most girls will love to do. I presume, for this reason, I've developed a tom-boy style, and found those colorful and girlish cute little tight lace tops or tanks really repulsive, I mean, it just feels odd when I look at myself in a mirror. Once, I even got misapprehended by going to an opposite restroom. But I am no lesbian in any ways, in fact, I'm trying to echo my open-minded and generous personalities through my manner, at lease I'm perceiving this way.

Everyone wants to look good in front of people, I'm no exception. Clothes are armors for one's self-esteems in my point of view. They can make people feel rich, confident and important. They also held the decorating job in which help people perform their own roles of life. Within our youngster’s cliques, fashion is what really ties us together. I will select cool and voguish costumes when going out with friends. Girls might think I'm hip, but guys will probably reluctant to ask me for a date. It's not a deliberate massage I intentionally to send, but I can hardly avoid without mostly changing my look. However, when meeting with serious professionals, it is rational for me to dress more generously to make a veracious and responsible impression other than an insecure mood create by fancy clothes.


In today's society, fashion changed rapidly through every-day's massive information. But rules and dress codes still exit, not only because it is a tradition, but because of their real means and functions that govern the social culture. Lots of people imitate to dress like charming celebrities, but they will never ever step into a political convention in that way, just like I won't go to someone's wedding with my adorable sleepwear, because I know it's inappropriate, no matter how pretty and priceless it is. Learning to speak this silent language is complex but critical and densely beneficial for our social life.

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Believing and Doudting Game

Believe


Fence is the most traditional way to separate things. The Chinese emperors spent generations to build the famous massive Great Wall to keep Mongolians from invading their territories. The United States' immigration problem has been the most concern issue within the nation for years. Previously, the federal government had built a 14-mile-stretch fence a decade ago in San Diego, Calif., that borders Tijuana, Mexico. It seems sensible to build high-tech fences along the Mexico-U.S. border to prevent illegal migrants from just walking into our country. According to the research, more than 1 million undocumented immigrants try to slip across the mountains and deserts every year along the 2,000-mile border into the US. If we construct an effective fence build with sensors and surveillance cameras, plus Border Patrols sweep with flood lights and trucks along the barrier, logically, it should control this notorious criminal activity.



Doubt

As a matter of fact, in those 1 million illegal immigrants, hundreds died trying to across the dangerous mountains and sizzling deserts in search of work in the US. Despite the existing difficulties, the numbers of immigrants never show any signs of decline. We are being selfish and even exposing symptoms of Eugenics belief-theory that claimed that the immigrants were inferior to Anglo-Saxons and were “polluting” the “pure” American bloodstream, thus trying to eliminate them from the perfect society. I'm not saying we are overt racial bias, moreover, I consent that the problem is severe, and it's reasonable to take actions to cut down immigrants, but not as simple as building fences. Think about it, building fences will just make it harder for these people to sneak in but will never stop them, just like the Europeans in 200 years ago who willing to take risk to sail over sea looking for a better life in the new world. As long as that intention penetrates in their mind, they would choose other more lethal routs, or invent methods to cross the border in just a matter of time. Therefore, the border fence program is superficial that by no means can solve the whole migration culture. A society is impossible to contain only the upper class and obtain equillium at the same time. A healthy society is a continuous struggle among people, the poor can become the rich, and the rich can one day turn out to be the poor. We should indeed help them convert their ideas and corporate with their governors to regulate the mass, get under the skin of the issue so we are able to give it a proper shot.